Palestinians are the actual descendants of the original biblical Jews that survived the Romans two thousand years ago. The genocide is being carried out against them by European Jewish Khazar converts claiming to be Jews.
Both the first President of the state of Israel Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, and the Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, believed that the Palestinians were descended from ancient Jews, especially Palestinian farmers. David Ben-Gurion wrote several books and articles on the subject. At the time there was no way to really know. However, genetics has progressed incredibly far, and we now know that Ben Gurion was correct. Palestinian farmers are the descendants of the Jews and more broadly Israelite’s who survived the Roman conquest.
Palestinians are the real Israelite's. Palestinians are the chosen people.
The Jewish Khazar Empire was located between the Black Sea and the Caspian, now southern Russia. The entire Khazar Empire originated from a powerful Turkic tribe that had converted and became Jewish starting in the year 740AD, when it came under pressure from both Christianity and Islam to convert. They ended up moving into Poland, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine, before the ‘Pale Of Settlement’, when Russia restricted them to that area.
That is why there eventually became to be about 8 million Jews in that area prior to WWII. Warsaw alone was 25 % Jews. Same for Krakow. But, all of them were merely these same Jewish Khazar converts from the 8th Century.
What else could explain this huge number of Jews in this area? We now call them Ashkenazim Jews. They make up 90% of the World’s ‘Jews’. But, they are mere converts.
Sephardic Jews of Spain and North Africa are also mere converts. They are actually Berbers that also converted during the 8th Century for the same reasons as the Khazars did.
Why should these European Khazar Jews with questionable ancestry, lacking a ‘seed’ of Abraham, be allowed to replace real descendants of biblical Jews that actually do carry the ‘seed’ of Abraham?
I thought Mate's comment in regard to Trump as being a very polarizing figure, while referencing the democrats in this regard as being excessive was not my perspective during Trump's first term in office. I wanted a Sanders win, even contributed to his campaign knowing full well the democrats would never let that happen, and fully backed war mongering Clinton. Over at MSNBC they use to referenced Bernie as an old Curmudgeon and were very dismissive of him. I lost friends who went on the attack because I didn't vote for Clinton, and was subject to some very abusive rhetoric because of my decision. To further the divide in this country Clinton's description of his base as being a half basket of deplorables really took off, and too many on Facebook posted their own demeaning commentary about Trump and his deplorable base, who were a threat to this country. If one listened to the left, and those not very involved in the political scene, Trump's MAGA supporters would be the end of us all. The democrats also pushed the lie of Russia-gate, and decried Trump's visit to Russia, and his sit down with Putin. Why? Was it because the democrats had a different agenda reflected in the coup Obama supported in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych, the pro-Russian president, and using a neo-Nazi crowd to do it? Also, how absurd to call Jan 6 an insurrection when it was no more then a riot? Not to mention the lie of Russia-gate which no one has been held accountable. I could go on, but I'll leave it hear. The democrats were extremely divisive and really polarized this country more so then Trump. Of course during his second term I have a somewhat different perspective on Trump, but this divide and conquer attitude has got to go.
Palestinians are the actual descendants of the original biblical Jews that survived the Romans two thousand years ago. The genocide is being carried out against them by European Jewish Khazar converts claiming to be Jews.
Both the first President of the state of Israel Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, and the Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, believed that the Palestinians were descended from ancient Jews, especially Palestinian farmers. David Ben-Gurion wrote several books and articles on the subject. At the time there was no way to really know. However, genetics has progressed incredibly far, and we now know that Ben Gurion was correct. Palestinian farmers are the descendants of the Jews and more broadly Israelite’s who survived the Roman conquest.
Palestinians are the real Israelite's. Palestinians are the chosen people.
The Jewish Khazar Empire was located between the Black Sea and the Caspian, now southern Russia. The entire Khazar Empire originated from a powerful Turkic tribe that had converted and became Jewish starting in the year 740AD, when it came under pressure from both Christianity and Islam to convert. They ended up moving into Poland, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine, before the ‘Pale Of Settlement’, when Russia restricted them to that area.
That is why there eventually became to be about 8 million Jews in that area prior to WWII. Warsaw alone was 25 % Jews. Same for Krakow. But, all of them were merely these same Jewish Khazar converts from the 8th Century.
What else could explain this huge number of Jews in this area? We now call them Ashkenazim Jews. They make up 90% of the World’s ‘Jews’. But, they are mere converts.
Sephardic Jews of Spain and North Africa are also mere converts. They are actually Berbers that also converted during the 8th Century for the same reasons as the Khazars did.
Why should these European Khazar Jews with questionable ancestry, lacking a ‘seed’ of Abraham, be allowed to replace real descendants of biblical Jews that actually do carry the ‘seed’ of Abraham?
I thought Mate's comment in regard to Trump as being a very polarizing figure, while referencing the democrats in this regard as being excessive was not my perspective during Trump's first term in office. I wanted a Sanders win, even contributed to his campaign knowing full well the democrats would never let that happen, and fully backed war mongering Clinton. Over at MSNBC they use to referenced Bernie as an old Curmudgeon and were very dismissive of him. I lost friends who went on the attack because I didn't vote for Clinton, and was subject to some very abusive rhetoric because of my decision. To further the divide in this country Clinton's description of his base as being a half basket of deplorables really took off, and too many on Facebook posted their own demeaning commentary about Trump and his deplorable base, who were a threat to this country. If one listened to the left, and those not very involved in the political scene, Trump's MAGA supporters would be the end of us all. The democrats also pushed the lie of Russia-gate, and decried Trump's visit to Russia, and his sit down with Putin. Why? Was it because the democrats had a different agenda reflected in the coup Obama supported in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych, the pro-Russian president, and using a neo-Nazi crowd to do it? Also, how absurd to call Jan 6 an insurrection when it was no more then a riot? Not to mention the lie of Russia-gate which no one has been held accountable. I could go on, but I'll leave it hear. The democrats were extremely divisive and really polarized this country more so then Trump. Of course during his second term I have a somewhat different perspective on Trump, but this divide and conquer attitude has got to go.