The controversy over the Trump administration's Signal group chat ignores a fundamental question: why is the US bombing Yemen? Plus, a UK journalist calls for censoring my debate on Ukraine.
I'm not in the least surprised a UK journalist calls for censoring your talk on Ukraine, the UK is rabidly pro Ukraine and anything that even smells of impartiality is seen as pro Russian and therefore unworthy of a mention. Withing the EU itself, the media is shamefully biased in one direction and therefore unable to inform a reader/listener with anything resembling truth.
Thanks, Aaron. I'm sure you did an excellent job on GB News, but I can't stand those fascists, so I'll give it a miss. Quite frankly, they don't deserve your presence.
It's always a pleasure to watch you on Judge Napolitano's show.
Moral outrage seems to be the propaganda tactic du jour. it allows people to “win” any argument by feeding their moral superiority complex, whilst defaming everything the other person says in their mind. Eg Are you a “Putin lover”, “why won’t you accept x, do you love terrorism” etc etc
The problem is, it’s constantly in the wrong place. This example you cite in Yemen is a good one. Also the example of the conversation in the Oval Office about Ukraine being worse than what’s actually happened in Ukraine
We are bombing Yemen because Israel wants us to.
Right on.
More specifically, perhaps because Miriam Adelson owns Trump and the Israel lobby owns the US Congress, minus Thomas Massie.
As Max Blumenthal mentioned: MAGA stands for Miriam Adelson's Goals Achieved.
I'm not in the least surprised a UK journalist calls for censoring your talk on Ukraine, the UK is rabidly pro Ukraine and anything that even smells of impartiality is seen as pro Russian and therefore unworthy of a mention. Withing the EU itself, the media is shamefully biased in one direction and therefore unable to inform a reader/listener with anything resembling truth.
Thanks, Aaron. I'm sure you did an excellent job on GB News, but I can't stand those fascists, so I'll give it a miss. Quite frankly, they don't deserve your presence.
It's always a pleasure to watch you on Judge Napolitano's show.
Moral outrage seems to be the propaganda tactic du jour. it allows people to “win” any argument by feeding their moral superiority complex, whilst defaming everything the other person says in their mind. Eg Are you a “Putin lover”, “why won’t you accept x, do you love terrorism” etc etc
The problem is, it’s constantly in the wrong place. This example you cite in Yemen is a good one. Also the example of the conversation in the Oval Office about Ukraine being worse than what’s actually happened in Ukraine